Банк рефератов содержит более 364 тысяч рефератов, курсовых и дипломных работ, шпаргалок и докладов по различным дисциплинам: истории, психологии, экономике, менеджменту, философии, праву, экологии. А также изложения, сочинения по литературе, отчеты по практике, топики по английскому.
Полнотекстовый поиск
Всего работ:
Теги названий
Авиация и космонавтика (304)
Административное право (123)
Арбитражный процесс (23)
Архитектура (113)
Астрология (4)
Астрономия (4814)
Банковское дело (5227)
Безопасность жизнедеятельности (2616)
Биографии (3423)
Биология (4214)
Биология и химия (1518)
Биржевое дело (68)
Ботаника и сельское хоз-во (2836)
Бухгалтерский учет и аудит (8269)
Валютные отношения (50)
Ветеринария (50)
Военная кафедра (762)
ГДЗ (2)
География (5275)
Геодезия (30)
Геология (1222)
Геополитика (43)
Государство и право (20403)
Гражданское право и процесс (465)
Делопроизводство (19)
Деньги и кредит (108)
ЕГЭ (173)
Естествознание (96)
Журналистика (899)
ЗНО (54)
Зоология (34)
Издательское дело и полиграфия (476)
Инвестиции (106)
Иностранный язык (62791)
Информатика (3562)
Информатика, программирование (6444)
Исторические личности (2165)
История (21319)
История техники (766)
Кибернетика (64)
Коммуникации и связь (3145)
Компьютерные науки (60)
Косметология (17)
Краеведение и этнография (588)
Краткое содержание произведений (1000)
Криминалистика (106)
Криминология (48)
Криптология (3)
Кулинария (1167)
Культура и искусство (8485)
Культурология (537)
Литература : зарубежная (2044)
Литература и русский язык (11657)
Логика (532)
Логистика (21)
Маркетинг (7985)
Математика (3721)
Медицина, здоровье (10549)
Медицинские науки (88)
Международное публичное право (58)
Международное частное право (36)
Международные отношения (2257)
Менеджмент (12491)
Металлургия (91)
Москвоведение (797)
Музыка (1338)
Муниципальное право (24)
Налоги, налогообложение (214)
Наука и техника (1141)
Начертательная геометрия (3)
Оккультизм и уфология (8)
Остальные рефераты (21692)
Педагогика (7850)
Политология (3801)
Право (682)
Право, юриспруденция (2881)
Предпринимательство (475)
Прикладные науки (1)
Промышленность, производство (7100)
Психология (8692)
психология, педагогика (4121)
Радиоэлектроника (443)
Реклама (952)
Религия и мифология (2967)
Риторика (23)
Сексология (748)
Социология (4876)
Статистика (95)
Страхование (107)
Строительные науки (7)
Строительство (2004)
Схемотехника (15)
Таможенная система (663)
Теория государства и права (240)
Теория организации (39)
Теплотехника (25)
Технология (624)
Товароведение (16)
Транспорт (2652)
Трудовое право (136)
Туризм (90)
Уголовное право и процесс (406)
Управление (95)
Управленческие науки (24)
Физика (3462)
Физкультура и спорт (4482)
Философия (7216)
Финансовые науки (4592)
Финансы (5386)
Фотография (3)
Химия (2244)
Хозяйственное право (23)
Цифровые устройства (29)
Экологическое право (35)
Экология (4517)
Экономика (20644)
Экономико-математическое моделирование (666)
Экономическая география (119)
Экономическая теория (2573)
Этика (889)
Юриспруденция (288)
Языковедение (148)
Языкознание, филология (1140)

Реферат: A Class Divided Essay Research Paper

Название: A Class Divided Essay Research Paper
Раздел: Топики по английскому языку
Тип: реферат Добавлен 01:42:37 11 ноября 2010 Похожие работы
Просмотров: 5 Комментариев: 14 Оценило: 2 человек Средний балл: 5 Оценка: неизвестно     Скачать

A Class Divided Essay, Research Paper

“A Class Divided” is a film that everyone should view no matter what race or ethnicity a person might be. Whether we realize it or not, everyone is prone to some form of discrimination or prejudice. Most Americans are not part of the dominant group, therefore due to being a minority, we undergo a feeling of inferiority. This film presents us with a different view on the color of someone’s skin. After viewing this, a person will hopefully be less likely to focus on the differences they have with other people and see people all as equals. This topic was of great interest to me due to the fact that I witness discrimination many times a day. Even myself, as a woman, will face discrimination in my life. This film helps those who do not face prejudices in their everyday life, realize what it is like to be on the other end.

Those who are a part of the dominant group feel no close association with those of a minority group and often feel threatened by them as a result. The dominant group consists of all rich, well-educated, white, Protestant, male, who are older and heterosexual. If lacking even one of these characteristics, a person is then considered a minority. This is the typical way that we separate the two groups. In this film however, they choose to deal with blue eyed people, versus brown eyed people.

The film starts off with a reunion between the third graders who were in the film, “Eye of the Storm.” A teacher put them through an experiment in which she initially tells them that the blue eyed children are better than the brown eyed. She gives them more privaledges such as giving them more play time, and allowing them to drink out of the drinking fountain, where as the brown eyed had to drink out of plastic cups. She also said that the two groups were not allowed to play with each other. She made the blue eyed children feel as though they were better and smarter than the others. The next day she switches places, and tells the brown eyed children that they are better than the blue eyed. The film also does this with adults, allowing the blue eyed to feel stupid as she points out how they forget things quicker, and do not pay as much attention. We see the reactions to this treatment throughout the movie, which I will go through step by step.

This film makes us realize how many concepts are still evident today in every day life. One is name calling, another is referring other people not in your “group” as “them” or “you guys.” The film also shows us that people who are normally cooperative, turn nasty and discriminating, while also this creates micro Cosmo societies in which the group bonds together. The most amazing concept is the fact that when the dominant group feels support, they appear to think quicker and do better on tests. It just shows that all we need is a little ego boost and we can do almost anything that we want. We need motivation from the people we look up to and respect.

The teacher points out to the children the ascribed trait that they were born with blue eyes or brown eyes. The first day in which the blue eyed had the upper hand, tensions grew between the two groups. One boy hit another due to the fact that he was called “brown eyes.” Someone of authority told him that he had blue eyes so therefore he was better. He called him a name to hurt him, not to be funny. He saw the brown eyed as different and therefore since they were told they were the best, he wanted to make him realize he was not as good as him. We see this happen in everyday life by things we call “stereotypes.” We automatically look at Mexicans and assume they are out to do harm. Jewish people we consider to be stingy with money. We have name calling just as the children were calling each other names. Our society uses names such as nigger, cracker and gook to dehumanize the other group. We witness name calling almost everyday, though we hardly even notice it anymore.

Another concept from the film was the arrogant attitudes where a group would refer to the others as “them” or “your people.” Even today we relate certain groups that are not like us to phrases such as these. This arrogance makes me think about Hitler and the Jews. Hitler told the Germans that all those who had blue eyes and blonde hair were better. Therefore, everyone who did not hold these features, should be removed. Obviously he was referring to the Jewish people. Everyone believed him or got brainwashed by him in my opinion. Even though the Jewish never caused harm to the Germans, they saw no need for them to remain on this earth.

Another concept I noticed was the fact that the different color eyed children were creating micro Cosmo societies in which those with similar eyes bonded together. They were not used to being called different having been brought up in a town where almost everyone was white and Christian. This was shown with even the adults. As the blue eyed were told to wait outside in the hall while the brown eyes were inside the room, they started to unite together. The idea even came up that they should just run in the room and take over. They wished to annoy the brown eyed people because they felt they were being left out. It was interesting how a few people stood up for themselves, while the others stood back and waited to see what happens. We see this today with children who first attend school. Especially in children who have no been exposed to different races yet. On the first day, the Mexican and black children will stand back and be quiet, while the white children are extremely outgoing. A class room of students were brought to see a policemen. Those who were white ran immediately up to the cop and started asking him questions. While the black and Hispanic children stood back, almost hiding. A lot of this has to do with the way we were raised. White children are most likely taught that cops are our friends and that they are there to help us. While most blacks and Hispanics are taught that cops are bad and they should keep their distance from them. Microcosm society’s can be seen all around. Even with the differences between women and men. We as women, can relate and understand other women easier, and in instances like shopping and so on, we tend to stick with them.

Another thing I noticed was that the children who were under normal circumstances, cooperative with one another, turned nasty and discriminating once told they were better. Those who were outside the superior group felt “immoralized” and “humiliated” that they did not hold the features of the other group. They felt like outsiders and therefore remained out the outside. In jobs this can become an obstacle if you only associated with those like you. Many ideas can be lost if everyone does not cooperate with one another. An example is Institutional Inequality. Minorities are oppressed and controlled by the dominant group. Therefore they are not getting a wide variety of views and opinions that could be beneficial. They have gatekeeps, which are people who limit access to positions of wealth, power and respect. This seems to me to make things at a stand still because those who are in the dominant group hold much of the same ideas.

The children became discriminating by saying things such as ” what are you doing with HIM?” he’s not like you! How can we all cooperate when appearances are such an issue.

Finally, we understand from the film that those who were in the superior group did better on tests. The first day, when the blue eyed were dominant, the brown eyed children took five and a half minutes to complete a spelling exercise. While the second day, when they were the top group, they completed the same exercise in two and a half minutes. The first day they were saying how they could not do it, they were not smart enough. Being told they were the smartest made the believe that they really were. A shock to me, was the fact that even adults reacted in this matter. They were all handed a test and the blue eyed adults not only did worse, but also were too ashamed to write their full names down. They either wrote their initials, or simply their last names. They felt hatred towards the brown eyed adults and started to slack behind due to this feelings. This just shows us how much of an impact society has on us. My mother used to tell me if I think positively I will do better academically. I never realized the extent to how right she was!

In the video the showed “The Eye of the Tiger” to people at institutions. They commented on it by explaining that seeing and respecting the teacher, they listen to what she says. One man comments that “hitting the kid, did not help, violence does not help.” They think that the video shows humans how it feels to walk in someone else’s shoes.

At the reunion, the adults explained how that they still feel like a family. During the experiment they found out how to hurt each other and all admit that they would not treat each other that way again. They said the reason for them acting the way they did towards each other was the fact that they had an opportunity to release all their pent up hostilities they had for each other. Once they got rid of the collars though, everyone disregarded that hostility and went back to their normal hugging. Overall they still hold that experiment in high regards and feel that it made them they way they are today.

This film taught me a lot. Although I was not a part of it myself, it helped me put everything into perspective. I realize how I would feel if I had been discriminated towards having blue eyes even though I could not help it. This film shows us first hand displays of discrimination. Discimination is a behavior. It’s when actions are unfavorable to a minority group. Prejudice is also shown which is a negative attitude. It’s a state of mind mostly derived from someones outward appearance. The children with blue eyed were prejudice towards the brown eyed children. We also saw how the children focused on ascribed traits which is something you are born with. Sadly enough a result from all of this created micro cosmo societies. The children bonded with those who psycially looked like them. I learned how ignorant it is for a person to focus on personal characteristics because after all, we will never know how it feels unless we step inside someone elses shoes.

Оценить/Добавить комментарий
Привет студентам) если возникают трудности с любой работой (от реферата и контрольных до диплома), можете обратиться на FAST-REFERAT.RU , я там обычно заказываю, все качественно и в срок) в любом случае попробуйте, за спрос денег не берут)
Olya22:35:20 28 августа 2019
.22:35:19 28 августа 2019
.22:35:18 28 августа 2019
.22:35:18 28 августа 2019
.22:35:17 28 августа 2019

Смотреть все комментарии (14)
Работы, похожие на Реферат: A Class Divided Essay Research Paper

Станете ли вы заказывать работу за деньги, если не найдете ее в Интернете?

Да, в любом случае.
Да, но только в случае крайней необходимости.
Возможно, в зависимости от цены.
Нет, напишу его сам.
Нет, забью.

Комментарии (3481)
Copyright © 2005-2020 BestReferat.ru support@bestreferat.ru реклама на сайте